These are the reasons given by the union

[account_disabled]

For workers not to support the popular party: --“it will cut even more in social rights ( education, health, social policies ). --“because they are sexist : they are against the parity law.” --“for homophobes ; "They are against homosexual marriages and against their adoption." --“for boycotting social laws in the autonomous communities in which they govern.” --“for being against an education in values: they want to repeal education for citizenship .” --“for making false complaints against the doctors of the emergency service at severo ochoa in leganés.” --“for having a double standard with corruption cases if they affect others: resignation; if they affect them, they demand respect for the presumption of innocence.” --“for being in the hands of far-right media pressure groups .” --“because they pass the dependency law through the triumphal arch, keeping the citizens who have the right to have it applied to them in precarious conditions.” --“for lying again and again: now it turns out that the rest of the political parties have created the crisis, not them. --“for wanting to put 12-year-old children in jail . And the convention on the rights of the child? The document concludes by stating that the reasons for not voting for the pp “go on and on .



Ervices of the general union of workers has sent a request to banks, savings banks, and hospitals to workers: not to stay at home on 20-n despite the disenchantment produced by the crisis, and that they bet on training “that responds to demands in Special Database the sense of social progress .” that party is not, for the union, the pp. From ugt they have prepared a list of twelve reasons why not to vote for mariano rajoy as president of the government, which include serious accusations against the 'popular'. These are the reasons given by the union for workers not to support the popular party: --“it will cut even more in social rights ( education, health, social policies ). --“because they are sexist : they are against the parity law.” --“for homophobes ; "They are against homosexual marriages and against their adoption." --“for boycotting social laws in the autonomous communities in which they govern.” --“for being against an education in values: they want to repeal education for citizenship .” --“for making false complaints against the doctors of the emergency service at severo ochoa in leganés.” --“for having a double standard with corruption cases if they affect others: resignation; if they affect them, they demand respect for the presumption of innocence.” --“for being in the hands of far-right media pressure groups .







Because they pass the dependency law through the triumphal arch, keeping the citizens who have the right to have it applied to them in precarious conditions.” --“for lying again and again: now it turns out that the rest of the political parties have created the crisis, not them. --“for wanting to put 12-year-old children in jail . And the convention on the rights of the child? The document concludes by stating that the reasons for not voting for the pp “go on and on . ”of the 42 questions included in the questionnaire, which the interviewers are already handling, the center for sociological research dedicates 19 questions to eta and the announcement of the end of violence. El confidencial digital has had access in its entirety to the cis questionnaire. After stating that “on october 20, eta announced the definitive cessation of its armed activity,” the first of these questions asks respondents what they felt when they heard the news . And the possible responses, in this order, are: worry, irritation, joy, hope, sadness, indifference and confusion. The next one is interested in the credibility given to the statement, and ranges, from 0 to 10, from “not at all credible” to “totally credible.